Hartley DNA & Genealogy

Sheryl is an important DNA match at Ancestry. That is because she is a shared match with my father’s cousin Joyce.

Joyce and Kristen

Sheryl is a shared match with Joyce and Kristen and we know what their relationship is:

Joyce and Kristen are 2nd cousins twice removed. Their common ancestors are Greenwood Hartley and Ann Emmet. Greenwood was from Trawden, Lancashire and Ann was from Bacup, Lancashire. That means that Sheryl, as a shared match, probably has ancestry that connects her to Lancashire. I previously mentioned Sheryl in this Blog from 2019.

Sheryl and Joyce

This possible connection goes back three more generations and is worth studying. I know that on my side, Greenwood Hartley’s father was Robert Hartley, but before that I am unsure.

Sheryl’s Genealogy

I started a tree for Sheryl previously. Here is the part I would like to look more closely at:

John Bracewell born 1834 emmigrated from Engalnd to the US. It is often difficult to trace a person who was born in one country and moved to another one.

Here is a bio for John:

I question the part about him being from Yorkshire. I think that Lancashire could be more likely. My ancestors who lived in Colne were very close to the Yorkshire border. Also he could not have removed to Illinois in 1836 if he came to the US in 1850. Here is a record of L.M. Bracewell’s death stating that his father was born in Colne:

John Bracewell (1834-1910)

We know that John ended up in Iowa:

Here is John and family in 1885 in Iowa:

From what I can tell, John’s wife Susan was born in Tennesee. Here is John in 1900:

Here he is listed as a capitalist. He shows that he has been naturalized and that he emmigrated in the year 1850.

This transcription appears to be important:

It is likely that the informant for this record would have known about John’s parents. It is likely that the informant was John’s wife Susan.

Here is the marriage record for John’s parents:

Here is Barnoldswick:

Interestingly, the write-up says that Barnoldswick was in the historic West Riding of Yorkshire.

Here is an interesting record from 1850 in Illinois:

Here we have John’s mother Mary with three sons under the head of Hartley Bracewell and apparently his wife Margaret and son. The last piece of the puzzle would be the 1841 Census for England.

The last column is interesting as it shows that all but the father John Bracewell were born outside of Lancashire. this is the Census for Hey Mile, Foulridge, Colne.

I assume that Hey and Hey Mile are similar locations.

All the pieces fit together – even the shipping record:

John Bracewell and Mary Starkie

These two were alive during the 1841 Census. However, I assume that John died before Mary moved to the US with her children. My tree has John born in 1778. However, the 1841 Census says that John was 45 at the time. That would put his birth closer to 1796. Due to the way the Census was taken, he could have been as old as 49 in 1841 or been born as early as 1792.

It looks like John Bracewell was a popular name:

My best guess would be that John’s father was Henry Bracewell. Looking back at the 1841 Census, the eldest male child was Henry – perhaps named for John’s father. The only John, father of John was in Manchester which is out of range for where I am looking.

Here is Sheryl’s Tree:

Sheryl stops at John Bracewell and Mary Starkie. I think the couple is right. I don’t think that John was born 8 March 1778 as Sheryl has.

I’ll update my tree:

Henry Bracewell

Here is my guess for a marriage for Henry and Jane:

Henry and Jane had quite a few children – which may help account for the DNA match:

I’m curious about the Hartley Bracewell, as there was also a Hartley Bracewell at the wedding of Henry Bracewell and Jane. This name also suggests to me that I am on the right track and have the right family as there is a Hartley Bracewell in the 1850 Census for Illinois (see above).

Ancestry Common Ancestors Wrong

At this point, I believe that I have proven the Ancestry Common Ancestors to be wrong:

So am I disappointed? Not really. I would rather know the actual tree of the person that I match. That means that the tree I had from my 2019 Blog mentioned above cannot be right:

Next Steps

I can still look into Henry Bracewell. This appears to be Henry and his wife Jane in the 1841 Census:

This couple was living to quite an old age for the day. They appear to have some of their grandchildren which later went to the US. Here is Salterforth – SE of Barnoldswick:

We can get some important information from the Census. First, Henry and Janae were not born in Yorkshire. I take that to mean they were born in Lancashire. My best guess for the father of Henry Bracewell is William Bracewell.

The son of Jonathan would have been 90 or 91 in 1841, so not a good match. Henry Brasewell is born in the wrong area. Also the place name Hey has already come up in this Blog.

William Bracewell and Mary

I’ll take a shot at this couple and then I should be done with the Blog. This marriage appears to be too early:

This marriage would have been about 25 years before Henry was born, so it is possible. Another possibility is that the marriage could have taken place in Yorkshire. The records above are just from Lancashire.

Here are some children of William Bracewell in Lancahsire after 1738:

There is a lot going on here. First, I don’t know where Law or Law Township is. Blacko is to the West of Foulridge. It is difficult to tell how many families we are dealing with. The Inghamit baptisms could be from a separate family. Also the Betty family is different. She is in there, because I was looking for all children of William. The earlier baptisms tended to omit the mother’s name.

A Possible Pilling Connection?

My second great-grandparents were Greenwood Hartley and Ann Emmet. Ann Emmet was from Bacup. I have not seen in Sheryl’s genealogy anyone in the Bacup area. That leaves the Trawden area. The two main lines from the Colne area are Hartley and Pilling.

My understanding is that Sarah Pilling above was likely a single mother. That means that we would not know the true father of Greenwood Pilling. That is one possibility for a connection between Joyce and Sheryl. Shackleton is also a possible connection. I am not sure of the Baldwin connection above. Also I don’t have a last name for the mother of Nancy Shackleton.

Summary and Conclusions

• I have proved that the connection to Hartley at Ancestry is based on a genealogy that is not correct
• I was able to create a much better geenalogy for Sheryl going back to the 1700’s
• I have not shown where the connection is. However, the connection seems to be from the Colne area. That means that the connection is somewhere on the ancestors of Hartley or Pilling
• More work is needed to look into these proposed connections and genealogies at Ancestry and elsewhere.
• Once we have enough good trees, we should be able to triangulate either a genealogy or place where our common ancestors lived.

A match recently showed up for me with Richard. I have been in touch with Richard before who is a match to me at AncestryDNA also:

Here is my match with Richard at MyHeritage:

I have written other Blogs about Richard. Here is one where I mention two other Blogs. Richard’s genealogy and  DNA match give evidence of our common descent from Phillip Frazer as shown in the image above.

 Richard and DNAPainter

I have not added Richard to my DNAPainter profile. Here is Richard added to my Chromosome 7:

The match is small and does not show up at Gedmatch where Richard also has his DNA results. However, the matches are those that I have as being from the Philip Frazer Line.

Here is my match with Richard on Chromosome 17:

Here Rihard overlaps with his brother Barry and also with Michael whose ancestry goes back to Richard Frazer. It is possible that the connection could be from the father of Richard and Philip who was Archibald Frazer.

My Philip Line DNA/Genealogy Tree

Here is part of the tree as I have it:

Richard and Barry are in the green area. I cut off much of my own line. Due to intermarriage and some missing wives’ names, it can be difficult to trace the DNA. For example, my ancestor James Frazer married his cousin Violet Frazer who was the daughter of Richard Frazer, the brother of Philip Frazer. Also I have no wives’ names for Philip or Richard.

My Sister Lori and Barry

My sister Lori has a good match with Richard’s brother Barry:

Here are Lori and Barry’s shared matches at AncestryDNA:

A blue dot means I probably have not looked at these matches.

This is how Lori and Barry match at Gedmatch:

Here is Barry added to Lori’s DNAPainter Profile:

Some Philip Frazer Genealogy

The genealogy goes back to the 1700’s and is a bit unclear. I have this 1950’s genealogy:

I clearly descend from James and Violet Frazer. Violet was a daughter of Richard Frazer. The above genealogy has Philip and George as the sons of Philip. My best guess is that James was a third son of Philip.

Here is the Tithe Applotment for Derrycastle (or Derrycashel):

Here we have listed George, Philip and James Frazer. My theory is that these three were sons of Philip Frazer. They may or may not be listed in their birth order. Ancestry gives the date of this record as 1833, but I am not sure of the actual date of the record.

Here is what I have at my web page:

Philip was a farmer probably in Derrycashel. He had three sons. The birth order is probably backwards above. He was born probably between 1751 and 1776. By the Tithe Applotment around 1833, he had probably passed away but his three children were still living in the area. As we have no further information about George other than a death date, he may have not married or if he did may not have had children.

I know that my 3rd great-grandfather James Frazer lived in this house in Derrycashel:

Perhaps his father Philip also lived there. George died in 1831. That means that the Tithe Applotment was before that time or that the Applotment listed the land as being still under George’s name. My 2nd great-grandfather George Wiliiam Frazer may have been named after this George.

Philip. Son of Philip and the 1830 Freeholder’s List

Joanna, a Frazer researcher living in Scotland has this document on her Frazer Tree at Ancestry:

This is an extract from the Roscommon Leitrim Gazette from September 1830 listing a Philip Frazer as a freeholder in Smutterna and Aughrefinnegan. This is interesting as it was unusual for people to own land during this time.

Here is Smutternaugh:

Smutternaugh is a few townlands away from Derrycashel.

Here is what I have on my old web page on the Frazers:

I believe that Anne was another daughter born to Philip in 1833.  These children appear to have been baptized in Kilmactranny Parish. This is in Sligo County. The Kilmactranny records have missiong information which would account for why there is no record for Anne Frazer.

I am trying to think of a scenario that would have Philip being a freeholder in Smutternaugh and also being a farmer in Derrycashel. One possibility would be that it was Philip the father who owned the land in Smutternaugh and the children lived in Derrycashel. The question would be: why did the land not go to the children?

More on Freeholders

I wrote to Frazer researcher Joanna and she was able to give additional insight to the Freeholder’s List. I think that Joanna was quoting here from an article:

“If your ancestor was a substantial small farmer or merchant, he was likely to have been a freeholder, especially if your ancestral farm or property holding (albeit rented) dates back to pre-famine times.

If your ancestor was a tenant he may have been a freeholder depending on the type of lease he had with his landlord.  

• • A freehold lease could be for one or more “lives” – his own life or for the lives of other people named in the lease. A lease of “3 lives” was a common type of lease, especially in the 1700s. It lasted for as long as the 3 people named in it remained alive. Generally, the others named on the lease were sons, sons-in-law, or “partners” (in-laws) sharing the land collectively. 

If your ancestor was part of a collective or shared interest in a farm of

land that was a freehold worth a mere 40 shillings (£2) per annum above the rent, he could appear on freeholders lists for the period from 1796 to 1829 (when both Catholic and Protestant “40 shilling freeholders” qualified to vote).”

This was new information to me. I had thought that being a leaseholder and a freeholder were mutually exclusive. Now I see that is not the case.

Who Were the Three Smutternagh Frazers in the Freeholder’s List?

Joanna feels that the three Frazers listed in the Freehold list were related to each other and I agree with this.

PHILIP FRAZER

He is listed first. I do not know if this is significant. Joanna notes:

I have collected a few of these newspaper Freeholders lists and various petitions to Viscount Lorton,  and found that in 1843 Alexander and Edward L Frazer are living at Smutternagh. 

From this I take it that Philip was no longer living in Smtternagh. So if I have the genealogy right and the right Philip, this suggests that my ancestor could have been Philip of Smutternaugh. Smutternagh is an odd-sounding Townland. Here is a photo found on-line of Smutternagh:

My assumption is that the Philip in the Freeholder’s List is the son of Philip and brother of George and my ancestor James Frazer. It also appears that some time soon after 1830, Philip moved from Smutternagh to Derrycashel. This does not answer all the questions. Smutternagh would have been in Kilbryan Parish. Yet the baptisms for Philip’s children are recorded in the Kilmactranny Church in Sligo County. Perhaps Philip’s wife was from Kilmactranny.

One confusing thing about Philip is that I have two marriages for Philip:

Here I assume that the notation son of Phiip is an interpretation. However, from the above information, I assume that the elder Phiip remarried to Jane Johnston of Kilmactranny or that Philip, son of Philip married twice. The second record is a birth record, but presumes that Philip Frazer and Mary Taylor were married prior to the birth of Philip. However, at the time of the Tithe Applotment, I believe that there is only one Philip listed. This must have been Philip Junior.

ALEXANDER AND EDWARD FRAZER

Joanna writes:

Alexander could probably be Alexander Stinson Frazer, but Edward L Frazer cannot be his son Edward Lillie Frazer (not born until 1854) 

Here is my guess for Alexander and Edward:

At the top is Archibald Frazer who married Mary Lillie (or Lilly). I have Philip as son of Philip and brother of my ancestor James Frazer. I have Alexander Frazer bottom right of the image above. Then I have Edward as the brother of Alexander Frazer. That would be my best guess at this time. The freeholders in the list were probably two brothers and one cousin (Philip). It would seem to make more sense if these three Freeholders were all brothers, however, that does not seem to be the case.

I also note that these three likely Freeholders were likely around the same age. Alexander would have only been 24 in 1830, so quite young. Edward would have been 27. Philip would have been older as he had at least three children by 1830. If it was his father who married in 1818 and Philip Junior who married Mary Taylor and had a child Philip in 1825, then he could have been born around 1800. If it was Philip Junior who married Jane Johnston in 1818, he would have been born in the late 1700’s.

My notes for Edward say that he moved to the USA, but I don’t remember where I got that information. Perhaps the Edward Lillie born in 1854 was named for Alexander Stinson Frazer’s brother Edward L who moved away.

ARCHIBALD FRAZER

I left out Archibald Frazer from the 1830 Freeholder’s List. Joanna notes that Archibald is not mentioned in an 1843 Freeholder’s list for Smtternagh, but now Edward L Frazer is listed. Let’s go back to the tree:

Here there are two options. First the Archibald could be the one at the top. I note that his birth date cannot be correct as he would have been 12 at the birth of William. I’ll need to correct that. My second guess is that Archibald may have had a son born before William Frazer. This could have been another Archibald. The Father of the Archibald who married Ann Stinson was also Archibald. One tradition would be to name your first son after your father. Perhaps this first son Archibald passed away or otherwise left the scene between 1830 and 1843 and the land went to his brother Edward L.

Summary and Conclusions

• Richard’s posting of his DNA results at MyHeritage was helpful
• One match with Richard and Michael on Chromosome 17 appear to go back to Archibald Frazer and Mary Lilly from around 1743
• A helpful document from that Joanna had indicated that one of my ancestors Philip Frazer may have lived in Smutteragh near Lough Key. This pushes back the likely location of my Frazer family by one generation
• My guess is that the three Freeholders listed in an 1830 Newspaper were Alexander and Archibald sons of Archibald Frazer and Stinson and Philip Frazer, son of Philip Frazer Senior – my ancestor.
•  One technique I use in my research is to try to tell a story based on what the facts appear to be saying. If the story makes sense, perhaps I have interpreted the facts correctly.
• I could further theorize that the Archibald who married Mary Lilly had land holdings or a lease for 3 generations. These three generations could have gone down to three of his granchildren: Philip, Alexander and Archibald. Archibald could have passed away and the land went to Edward L Frazer.
• This 1830 Frazer Freeholder List could use further analysis in the future.

MyHeritage recently came out with new Theories of Relativity. I’ll check out a few for my Mom.

Rita with Latvian Heritage

Here is the Theory:

I only see a partial tree for Rita:

The Theory follows the Spengel Line. I’ll just look at the Theory. The theory doesn’t check out according to my tree. In order for it to work, Sophia would have had to have married a Spengel after a Schwechheimer. However, my genealogy does not show that. I’ll pass on this Theory for now.

Mom and Malcolm

Malcolm is from the United Kingdom. Here is his tree:

The Theory connects Malcolm and my mother on his maternal side. The tree confusingly has a Gadd as the father as a Dodsworth. I will need to build my own tree at Ancestry to verify:

In 1891, Louisa was living with her widowed mather Emily in Nether Hallam, Sheffield, England. It appears that Louisa could have been from a second husband of Emily as the first two daughters on the Census have the surname of Green.

Next I need to make the connection from Lockwood to Dodworth. Two of the three trees at Ancestry have Emily Lockwook as the mosther of Louisa Dodwood:

The third tree does not give parents. I will make the assumption that Malcolm knew who his grandmother was.

Here is Emily Lockwood in the 1881 Census:

She was an unmarried file cutter living in Nether Hallam, Sheffied. There also was an Ellis family living next door. I was able to find a little more information at FamilySearch:

Here is St George:

So, I have a sort of a connection now.

My DNA/Genealogy Tree for Ellis

I have a short Ellis tree already:

After a little searching, I see that Derek is a match to my mom at AncestryDNA. . I’ll add in Emma’s Line.

That makes Malcolm a third cousin to my mother. It looks as if Emma Ellis Tattershall could have been named for her Aunt Emma who was 7 years older than her? I think I see a mistake in that Emma Ellis should not have a Tatershall in her name.

Adding the DNA Match to My Mother’s Profile

Here is where Malcolm and my mom match:

Here I have ‘painted’ Malcolms matches to my mom in orange:

These matches are in places where there were no previous matches. This is also the first maternal match my mother has on Chromosome 21.

Malcolm and my mom also have shared DNA matches with at least three other known Nicholson/Ellis descendants at MyHeritage.

When I show all my mother’s paternal and maternal DNA matches, the orange DNA from Ellis/Roebuck gets a bit lost:

Summary and Conclusions

• I didn’t follow through on the match with Rita. However, the fact that she has Latvian genealogy means that there must be a match somewhere.
• Often, the conclusions for the more obscure Theories of Relativity are wrong and need correcting
• In this case, the Theory lead me in the right direction toward Ellis/Roebuck DNA
• I was glad to add this DNA to my mother’s DNA profile

I noticed that MyHeritage has some new Theories of Relativity. Here is one that I don’t recall from before:

If this relationship is right, Jan would be my 1/2 fourth cousin once removed. The first and second line agree with the tree that I have which shows that Jacob Gagnus had two wives and these two children of these two wives:

That is a lot of children.

Jan’s tree goes up to August Schmidt:

The 1941 is wrong. I think that 1841 was meant.

Some Problems with MyHeritage’s Theory

The first is that I should not match by DNA on Chromosome 20. Here is where we show that we match:

I have mapped my maternal Chromosome 20:

This shows my entire Chromosome 20 should be on the Lentz side. The Theory is showing the match on my Rathfelder side. DNA Painter shows actual Lentz side relative matches where I match Jan also. My assumption is that the match goes back somehow on my mother’s German Lentz side.

Jan shows that August Schmidt was from Ruckershausen, Germany which is quite a distance from Latvia:

A Latvian Theory with Sane

Sane seems more promising:

However, I don’t agree with the tree. As far as I know, I don’t have any Stumpf ancestors.

Making My Own Sane Tree

Here is a record of Sane’s grandfather Hugo from Jesus Church:

The next to the last column indicates that his mother was Anna Charlotte Muller.

Here is the Schwechheimer line that Sane has:

I note that I have George Gerhard in one of my trees:

This tree makes more sense than MyHeritage’s Theory Tree.  Note that in this tree, I am doubly related to Otis who tested at AncestryDNA. I tried my best to describe Otis’ tree in this Blog.

At this point, I am tempted to add Sane to this tree on the right hand side under Johann Georg Schwechheimer. Here is the tree I built for Otis:

Here is where I have Sane:

I would not be surprised if we are related on other lines. The Schwechheimer family was large, so it was not uncommon for a Schwechheimer to marry a Schwechheimer as noted in Sane’s tree.

Sane’s DNA Match

Sane and I share DNA on two chromosomes:

He is what I have mapped so far on my maternal side:

My matches with Sane appear to fall in the orange area which is my mother’s father’s side.

Other DNA Matches with Sane in My Family

For some reason, I don’t see that my mother has a match with Sane which is strange. Only one of my five siblings has a match with Sane. Still, I will assume that my match is correct. My brother Jim shows triangulation with other Latvians which indicates that the DNA match is real:

Normunds is a second cousin – related on bother the Rathfelder and Gangnus sides.

At DNA Painter, I gave my match with Sane a dark green color so it would show up well:

I assume these matches are correct. However, the DNA would go back to 1723 which is quite old. There are possibly closer connections which I have not found yet. Sane’s match indicates that the matches I have with the people in the orange above her matches match me on the Rathfelder rather than the Gangnus side. That is because this Scwheccheimer match is on my Rathfelder side:

Ancestry shows possible parents for Johann Markus Schweccheimer in Germany, but I have not followed up on them. Here is where I have Johann Markus born:

The place is called Altlußheim bei Hockenheim Kraichgau Baden. It is on the Rhine River in Germany.

Summary and Conclusions

• I looked at two of my new Theories of Relativity at MyHeritage
• One was not correct and one was correct
• The match that was correct went back to 1723. That seems to be about the limit of what I would expect for an identifiable match
• The match was from Hirschenhof, Latvia. This was a German colony where many of the families intermarried with each other
• I may have other connections with Sane, but went with this early Swchweccheimer match
• I also mapped the match using DNAPainter
• It could take a while to check out all the new Theories at MyHeritage

This is a long title. Some of the experts may say that it would be impossible to answer the question in the title of this Blog. However, my mom matches Thelma and the computers at Ancestry have made a connection to Nicholson thusly:

Thelma appears to be having a toast. Cheers, Thelma!

Thelm shows as a half 5th cousin. I believe that is only because I have not identified Elizabeth Nicholson as a child of John and Hephzibah:

However, if Elizabeth was born in 1758, she would fit into the family time-wise.

Thelma’s tree shows that her father was from Sheffield:

My mom and Thelma do not show any shared DNA matches. This would make sense as my mom and Thelma share 14 cM. Shared matches must be 20 cM or more.

Thelma’s Genealogy

Thelma shows no Nicholsons in her genealogy. However, her tree at Ancestry does not go back that far. Here is Lawrence with his parents in 1939:

Mark Parker

I’ll move on quickly to Mark Parker. Mark was quite young in 1891:

The previous page of the Census reveals his parents:

Henry was a ‘bon scale cutter’. However, now we want to follow his wife Emily. Ancestry gives this hint:

This matches what Thelma has in her tree. Though not shown above, when I click on the link for Emily Wallace, it shows her father as Mark Wallace.

Mark Wallace

This appears to be Mark Wallace in the 1841 Census for Sheffield:

It appears that his father had passed away. However, according to Thelma’s tree and Ancestry, we want to follow Mark’s mother Elizabeth next. She would have been born in the 1700’s. This appears to be Mark’s baptismal record from the Sheffeildindexers website:

Next, it would be nice to find a marriage record for James Wallace and Elizabeth. I did not see a marriage record at the Sheffieldindexers site. I took the hint that Ancestry had for Elizabeth as Elizabeth Davenport.

I see an Elizabeth Davenport in the Sheffield Indexers:

However, this Elizabeth is a generation too late. The 1861 Census indicates that Elizabeth was born in Sheffield:

Here is a hint for Elizabeth’s birth:

Elizabeth Davenport is already past Thelma’s tree.

Is Thomas Davenport’s wife Elizabeth Nicholson?

I suppose I am not really given certain proof, but just showing probably cause in this Blog. I just realized I was looking in Baptisms in the Sheffield Indexer, when I should have been looking for Marriages. Unfortunately, I could find neither Thomas Davenport nor Elizabeth Nicholson in the 1700’s period I am looking for. Here is where Ancestry gets the original matchup:

This is from one reference. The daughter Elizabeth matches up well with birth and death dates of 1786-1862. The reference in the Shaw Family tree is this:

Does this imply that this was Elizabeth’s second marriage? The Shaw tree refers to another tree owned by Deborah. Deborah matches my mother also by 11 cM, but the connection is shown differently:

This further confuses the issue:

• If Thelma and Deborah match each other, then the above connection could be wrong and my mom may match both Deborah and Thelma through Sheffield
• Thelma and Deborah may not match each other
• Both genealogical connection could be right.
• One connection may be right and the other wrong.

Based on the genealogy I know right now, I would guess that the Deborah connection back to Lentz may be right. However, I don’t see clear evidence that Thelma’s genealogy goes back to Nicholson unless I am missing something.

Summar and Conclusions

• These connections from Ancestry are worth pursuing
• Thelma’s genealogy in Sheffield seemed right but the clues dried up at Elizabeth Nicholson
• I did not look at all of Thelma’s lines, so there may be a connection on another Sheffield Line.

Here is my largest unidentified match at FTDNA:

The surname is Beaudet, which is probably not relevant. The shared DNA is 92 cM which is important. The match is challenging as no ancestral surnames are given and there is no family tree. He is listed between a known 2nd cousin once removed and a known 2nd cousin. I had written to him before but got no response. However, at that time, I mentioned that he was related to me on my Hartley side. The blue icon by his name indicates paternal or Hartley side also. While that may be true, that might have thrown him of as I should be able to figure out a closer connection.

My DNA Match with Beaudet

Our match leaves a fingerprint which I can track down:

I have mapped out many of my known matches on DNAPainter. Here is my paternal side which is where I match Beaudet:

My match with Beaudet on Chromosome 2 is in the same area as my match with my father’s cousin Maury:

Perhaps I was not wrong in my previous estimation. All matches seem to lead to a Hartley background.

The Genealogy Route

After going through many ‘papers’ online that my cousin worked on, I found Benjamin. Maury’s daughter married a Beaudet. That is where the connection comes in. Here, I added Beaudet:

Usually, I enter the first name, but I had already identified the match name in the Blog by the surname. The Gifford family is a large branch of the Hartley family. Beaudet would be my second cousin once removed. Mystery solved.

I was also able to link Beaudet to my tree at Ancestry showing his DNA match:

I assume that the blue dot by his name indicates the DNA match. Now, when I see the match at FTDNA, the correct relationship shows up:

Summary and Conclusions

• I was baffled by a Beaudet match at FTDNA
• DNAPainter pointed to the match being from my Hartley ancestry and more specifically probably related to my father’s cousin Maury
• Sleuthing through genealogical papers provided by my 2nd cousin Beth helped me find the match.
• FTDNA provides a way to link the match to my tree at FTDNA and I did that also