![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-05-01-08_49_21-Window.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nYF00890 is Smith. YF106096 is Nutter and the last two ID numbers are my brother and me.\u00a0 When I press the live button on the tree, I get this:<\/p>\n
This is how the YTree looked for A11132 late last year:<\/p>\n This just included Nutter and myself. This must have changed when I added my brother’s kit. Notice that this had a formed date and a TMRCA. Last year’s formed date of 1700 ybp seems way off as that would be roughly the year 300 AD. Here is what FTDNA has:<\/p>\n First, I will look at changes under my branch. It makes sense that I would be under a new branch by adding my brother. At FTDNA, that branch is called FT225247. At YFull it is called A11136. What the A11132 tree is telling me that my brother and I share all the SNPs under A11132. They are:<\/p>\n It also tells me that we don’t share:<\/p>\n This is consistant with Variants that my brother and I have under FT225247:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The difference is that the Mawdsley BigY tester does not have his results posted at YFull. He is the one that split the previous A11132 into A11132 and A11134. As Nutter tested positive for A11134 and A11135, he would be A11134 also.<\/p>\n Mr. Smith who was in the former A11138 group would be better positioned to do this analysis, but I’ll see what I can see from my viewpoint. Here is the present (non-Live) view of the YTree:<\/p>\n This shows that Mr. Smith with the low ID# shares his group now with two new memebers. One member appears to be from Australia or have ancestors from Australia. The Tree shows that A11138 has three SNPs:<\/p>\n This is interesting because A11138 used to be in it’s own group of one.<\/p>\n Here is the new designation under the ‘Live’ Tree:<\/p>\n Now Mr. Smith is under Y82274 (which is under A11138) and the new testers are under Y82274 at Y445810. Mr. Smith’s Y82274 appears to have 19 SNPs, so would be quite old. Y445810 is in a group of 4 SNPs, so would be younger. These new testers must have not tested at FTDNA as they do not show up there. So, as I was writing this Blog, Mr. Smith who was previously A11138, got pulled down to Y82274, then the two new testers were more closely relataed to each other. They left Mr. Smith at Y82274 and moved down to the newer Y445810. The next step is for YFull to come up with TMRCA numbers. Most people greatly appreciate having those dates. This is one case where YFull has more testers directly under this branch of A11138 than FTDNA has, so their estimates should be more acccurate.<\/p>\n As there are four SNPs in Y445810, that could indicate that SNP is from around the 1600’s. However, it may be earlier if the two new testers have private variants. My guess is that there will be little difference between the date of A11138 and Y82274. YFull previously had A11138 around the 350AD and FTDNA has it at around the year 500AD.<\/p>\n Or, the question could be, why does Smith have so many SNPs now? My guess is that is because he took the older BigY500 test. This test covered less of the Y Chromosome compared to the newer testing. When the new testers tested, it was clear that they shared many of their SNPs with Smith. Under the older testing at FTDNA, Smith had 11 Private Variants since A11138:<\/p>\n Now, he is showing 20 SNPs at YFull:<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nChanges under A11132<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
<\/a><\/p>\nA11138 to Y82274<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
<\/a><\/p>\nWhy So Many SNPs for Y82274?<\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n