![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/EstherGran.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nI noticed recently that Esther has a new match at Gedmatch named Doug. Doug is Esther’s fourth match on her ‘One to Many’ list at Gedmatch. Her first is my mother in law. The second is my wife. The third is Ken who I blogged about here<\/a>.\u00a0 I have a feeling that Ken and Doug will match by DNA.<\/p>\n Here is Doug’s tree:<\/p>\n A lot of Douglas’ ancestors were from Harbour Buffet. Douglas has two Samuel Kirby’s in his ancestry. Also an Upshall which is great. Notably missing from Douglas’ ancestry is the Dicks name. I have written many blogs about the Dicks family.<\/p>\n Here is Doug’s match to Esther by DNA at Gedmatch:<\/p>\n Remember that I thought that Doug would have a big match with Ken above? Well I checked and didn’t see Ken on Doug’s ‘One to Many’ match list at Gedmatch. This is a little surprising as they appear to share at least two surnames.<\/p>\n My mother in law, Joan is related to her 1\/2 Aunt Esther on the Upshall line, but not the Kirby line. Here is how Joan matches Doug by DNA:<\/p>\n When I add in Esther to the mix, here is a simplified view of their combined ancestry:<\/p>\n Triangulation as implied by the name requires the DNA matching between three people. The potential for this happens at Chromosome 2. Esther and Douglas match between about 209 and 243M. Douglas and Joan and Esther and Joan match between about 238 and 243M. When this happens, it is likely that the three people share a common ancestor. In this case, an Upshall common ancestor would be possible based on the genealogy. That is, possible, until I consider Molly.<\/p>\n Molly is in the Dicks DNA Project that I have been working on for some time. She also matches Douglas on Chromosome 2. Here is how Douglas matches Esther (1) Molly’s brother Howie (2), Molly (3) and Joan (4):<\/p>\n This shows that Molly and her brother Howie are in a Triangulation Group (TG) with Douglas and Esther. Then Douglas, Esther and Joan are in a TG. How can this be?<\/p>\n The problem above is that Molly has no known Upshall ancestry but has Crann and Dicks ancestry. Douglas has no known Dicks ancestry but has Upshall ancestry. In a previous Blog<\/a>, I had theorized that either an Upshall or a Dicks had married a Crann:<\/p>\n This was based on Crann lines in green above with no Newfoundland ancestry. What if the father of Henry Upshall above married a Crann? Supposing that Crann was also the mother of Jane Upshall? This is perhaps a house of cards, but an interesting theory that would explain the DNA matches. Under this scenario, the TG for Molly, Howie, Esther and Douglas would represent Crann DNA. The TG for Douglas, Esther and Joan could either be Upshall or Crann DNA.<\/p>\n The theory above is not without its problems. One is that Douglas doesn’t match any of the non-Newfoundland people with Crann ancestry. The other problem is that I notice Douglas has a tree on Ancestry with different ancestors for Jane Upshall:<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nDoug and My Mother in Law, Joan<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n
DNA Triangulation – Upshall?<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nA Possible Crann Explanation for Douglas, Esther, Molly, Howie and Joan<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\na few arguments against my theory<\/h5>\n