![\"cathydicksburtonline\"](\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/CathyDicksBurtonLine.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nCathy’s closest relative in the Dicks DNA Project is Denise (2nd cousin once removed). Here is how she matches everyone in the Project:<\/p>\n
The first thing I noticed is that Cathy doesn’t match anyone in the Henry Dicks Line. They are in the rectangle to the lower right of the comparison. The Henry Dicks is believed to be a brother to Christopher Dicks b. 1784. As expected, Cathy’s largest match is with Denise.<\/p>\n Cathy got my attention as she is mentioned in 2 New Ancestor Discoveries (NADs) at AncestryDNA. Esther is my wife’s 1\/2 great Aunt. Esther and Cathy share many surnames including Dicks, Burton, Kirby and possibly Butler. When Ancestry sees that many people match by DNA and match by genealogy they give what is called a NAD. Actually, the others match each other by DNA, but they are not in Esther’s genealogy. That is why the note for Esther’s NADs says these are potential ancestors or relatives not already in Esther’s family tree:<\/p>\n Here are the areas where Cathy and Esther match:<\/p>\n The names above would be on Esther’s maternal side where she doesn’t match Joan. I checked gedmatch and Esther does not match Cathy and Joan in these three above segments. That means that it possible that these segments could represent the Kirby or Butler names as suggested by AncestryDNA.<\/p>\n Now I will see who Cathy triangulated with in the Dicks Project. Triangulation is a more rigorous method than AncestryDNA uses. Triangulation means that 3 people match each other on the same Chromosome and the same segment of that chromosome. When this happens, those three (or more) have a common ancestor. This is helpful in verifying genealogy and finding new ancestors.<\/p>\n There is already a Dicks TG at Chromosome 2 with Denise, Sandra, Joan and Nelson. Now Cathy has joined it.<\/p>\n All the people in the column to the right above should be in this TG.<\/p>\n I mention Molly and Kirsten as it is interesting that they are not<\/em> in the TG. They are shown in purple circles.\u00a0 It looks like they could have at least matched Cathy and Denise but did not. That means that they their match at this spot represents a different common ancestor than the others in the TG. One possibility is that The TG represents Christopher Dicks in the top circle and the match Molly and Kirsten have represents the wife (or it could be the other way around). Another possibility is that Molly and Kirsten have a separate common ancestor from the Dicks.<\/p>\n Sort of. This should have been a TG before.<\/p>\n Here we have a TG with Cathy, Nelson, Judy, and Wallace. The reason I didn’t have this TG before is because I found no match between Judy and Nelson. Now with Cathy in the mix, I see that Judy and Nelson should be in the TG. So I looked for a smaller match (between 5 and 7 cM) between Judy and Nelson and see that there was one right where we needed it for the TG.<\/p>\n It seems we know quite a bit about the DNA of Christopher Dicks and his wife Margaret. Here is the updated Dicks TG Matrix. This represents 20 DNA tested Dicks descendants and 33 TGs.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nCathy and Esther at AncestryDNA<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nCathy and Triangulation<\/h4>\n
Cathy’s Triangulation Group (TG) at chromosome 2<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nCathy in a new TG (chromosome 5)<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n