![\"cherylcharles\"](\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/CherylCharles.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nCheryl is important for the Adams line as now there are three there. Charles is important for the Burton Line as he also makes the third in that line. Plus he is the closest to the common ancestors of the line of Frances Dicks and Charles Burton.<\/p>\n
Cheryl and Charles’ Newfoundland DNA<\/h4>\n
When I compare Cheryl to Nelson at gedmatch, it says that their common ancestor is 3.5 generations away. That is exactly what we should expect for these two as they are 2nd cousins, once removed. Here are Cheryl and Charles compared to the other 19 Dicks descendants’ DNA:<\/p>\n
I found it interesting that Cheryl and Esther were more closely related by DNA than Cheryl and Nelson. Remember Cheryl and Nelson were 2nd cousins once removed. However, Cheryl and Esther are 3rd cousins once removed. My guess is that Esther and Cheryl have some additional common ancestors.<\/p>\n Triangulation Groups (or TGs) are when 3 or more people have DNA that matches each other on the same chromosome and the same segment of that chromosome. When that happens, those 3 share a common ancestor. However, it may be difficult to determine who that common ancestor is. In a family project such as this, it is most likely that that common ancestor would be a Dicks ancestor or a spouse of a Dicks ancestor.<\/p>\n What I do is compare the detailed results of each of the 21 Dicks descendants in the project to look for TGs. Then it should be possible to draw some conclusions from those results.<\/p>\n Here we have our 2 new Project people: Cheryl and Charles:<\/p>\n This is a new TG and it gets a little complicated right from the start. This is a four person TG, so there are different overlaps. If we look at this as 2 TGs, the first would go from 70M to 83M and the second TG would go from 83M to 106M. Here is how it looks from Cheryl’s point of view:<\/p>\n #1 is Cheryl’s match to Esther. #2 is Joan showing where she comes into the TG later (in green). #3 is Charles. #4 is Wallace, #5 is Claude and #8 is Nelson – all outside the TG(s). I am tempted to call this one TG. One reason is that Joan and Charles match from 70M to 84M, going a little over the first 83M boundary of the TG. Also the same people are in both sections. It may be that Cheryl just had a poor DNA read in the section between her green and yellow sections of her matches.<\/p>\n Another possibility could be that this could represent 2 Dicks Lines. Recall we have a Henry Dicks Line and a Christopher Dicks line.<\/p>\n Here is what the new TG1 looks like on the Dicks Genealogy Chart:<\/p>\n Observe:<\/p>\n I had already found a TG at Chromosome 9. Now Cheryl is added to that.<\/p>\n This will look a lot like TG1 except that Kirsten is replacing Charles:<\/p>\n Here is my guess for TG10, although technically, this TG could be pointing to either Elizabeth Dicks or Thomas Adams DNA:<\/p>\n I split this existing TG13 into TG13A with Cheryl and TG13B with Judy. Kenneth and Gordon from the Henry Line are in both TGs.<\/p>\n Here I have Gordon and Kenneth in red. Cheryl is in TG13A and Judy in yellow (TG13B). Again, this chart is focused on the Dicks family. There is a possibility that there could be another family in common between these lines that I don’t know about.<\/p>\n Here I see 2 TGs and some people that are not in the 2 TGs. First is Charles, Joan and Esther in gold. Then there is Nelson, Gordon, Charles, Kenneth and Judy in the pink TG. Howie, Molly and Pauline would be in a TG, but siblings are generally not considered as part of a TG trio. That is because they had to get all of their DNA from their parents, so it would be like 2 people if you consider Molly and Howie as their parent and Pauline as the other person.<\/p>\n Here are a few comments:<\/p>\n Note that Charles is in two different TGs. The blue circles represent the non-TG with Molly, Howie and Pauline who have a Joyce ancestor.<\/p>\n The common area in this TG is between 30M and 37M. As this is likely a Dicks TG. Esther and Joan’s match likely represent the non-Dicks Upshall ancestry. This is important to know when checking matches in this area of the Chromosome.<\/p>\n Here is what Cheryl’s browser looks like:<\/p>\n Again, I am thinking that Charles may be related on the Upshall Line of Esther. Another possibility is the Burton line. Esther and Charles both have Burtons in their ancestry.<\/p>\n I have made quite a few changes to the Dicks Triangulation Matrix:<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nThe Dicks DNA Details: Triangulation Groups<\/h4>\n
Chromosome 1: One TG Or Two?<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n
TG9A Revised<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nTG10 – Adams Or Dicks DNA?<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nTG13 – A Two Way Split<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nChromosome 15 – A Lot Going On<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
<\/a><\/p>\nNew TG17<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nChromosome 18 – Two New Cheryl TGs<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n
New Chromosome 20 TG<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nUpdated Dicks Triangulation Matrix<\/h4>\n