![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/2021-10-05-21_45_41-Window.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nLori is at 4% painted. I would like to get her up into the 30’s. It looks like I was just looking at Lori’s paternal side. This makes sense as my mom has tested for DNA. For some reason, I don’t have a match name for the Mary Pilling DNA.<\/p>\n
Adding Cindy’s X Chromosome Match<\/h2>\n
Cindy is a first cousin. I don’t usually add first cousins, but because the connection is through Cindy’s father, that means that Cindy’s X Chromosome match must be through Cindy’s father’s mother. She was Emma Lentz:<\/p>\n
This was a large 100 cM match on the X Chromosome and is the first maternal match that I have painted for Lori. This brings Lori up to 5% painted.<\/p>\n There will be a lot of Hartley matches for Lori at Gedmatch:<\/p>\n These Hartley matches are in light blue and bring Lori up to 17% painted, or about half of my goal for Lori.<\/p>\n Notice that Cindy and Carolyn overlap but have different common ancestors. That is because that DNA that Cindy and Lori share from their grandmother Emma Lentz born 1900 is the same DNA that Lori and Carolyn share from either Nicholson born in 1836 or his Ellis wife.<\/p>\n Here is Lori at 26% painted:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In the key, I now have the ancestors divided into Lori’s four grandparent groups.<\/p>\n Lori has this important match at MyHeritage, but the relationship is shown at AncestryDNA:<\/p>\n Stephen is also related:<\/p>\n Ron and Steve are also related through the McMaster line but further back in time.<\/p>\n When I paint Ron and Stephen, I see a connection to Emily who has Mcmaster ancestry:<\/p>\n That means that on Chromosome 13, the connection is most likely on the McMaster side:<\/p>\n I could add another pair of common ancestors to DNAPainter, but I’ll leave it as it is for now.<\/p>\n I have\u00a0 adifferent interpretation:<\/p>\n Marille is in the bottom left of this chart and I am in the blue section. Here we are 6th cousins instead of MyHeritage’s 5th cousins. I painted a segment for Marilee that was 6.7 cM. DNAPainter’s default is to paint only segments of 7 cM and more.<\/p>\n The small segment is in Chromosome 20. The jury is still out on Marilee’s ancestry. I think that I have the best guess. However, I think that MyHeritage’s Theory may be adding some bad information to the internet.<\/p>\n I’m never quite sure about some of these older McMaster connections, but I’ll assume this one is right.<\/p>\n Assuming that Margery was not also a Frazer, this puts Paul and Susan’s green matches in the McMaster camp.<\/p>\n This is a bit short of the 30% or more I wanted to have for Lori, but I may fill in more later:<\/p>\n I forgot Astrid on the Rathfelder Line:<\/p>\n In a previous Blog, I started this chart:<\/p>\n The coverage of common ancestors for Lori looks good except for Howorth.<\/p>\n Also I see Lori could have more matches under Nicholson and Ellis.<\/p>\n After adding four matches I missed, Lori is still at 28% painted:<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nMore Gedmatch Matches<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nFilling in Some More X Chromosome at Gedmatch<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nContinuing with Lori’s Autosomal Matches at Gedmatch<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nLori’s Matches at MyHeritage<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nThe McMaster Connection<\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nMarilee’s Theory at MyHeritage<\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nLori and Warwick on the McMaster Line<\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nLori at 28% Painted<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nAdding Astrid<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nComparing Lori’s Common Ancestors to Other Mapped Siblings<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n