{"id":14508,"date":"2020-04-24T21:06:40","date_gmt":"2020-04-24T21:06:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/?p=14508"},"modified":"2020-04-24T21:06:40","modified_gmt":"2020-04-24T21:06:40","slug":"getting-ready-for-a-new-hartley-bigy-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/2020\/04\/24\/getting-ready-for-a-new-hartley-bigy-test\/","title":{"rendered":"Getting Ready for a New Hartley BigY Test"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>During the DNA Day YDNA sale I ordered a BigY test for my brother. Bob Wood of the FTDNA &#8211; BigY Facebook Page promotes a rule of three. That means test yourself, test a distant relative and test a close relative for BigY. That combination gives good branching for your surname &#8211; in this case Hartley. In this Blog, I&#8217;ll talk about the current state of my Branch of Hartley YDNA and what I might expect from this new test.<\/p>\n<h2>The Current Situation of My Branch of Hartley BigY DNA<\/h2>\n<p>I say my branch because there are many different Hartley branches that are not closely related. Here is where I am now with two other Hartley testers and one Smith:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-13_49_00-Window.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-14509\" src=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-13_49_00-Window.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"298\" height=\"656\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-13_49_00-Window.png 298w, http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-13_49_00-Window-136x300.png 136w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 298px) 100vw, 298px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Hartley and Smith<\/h3>\n<p>The Smith is on the right and is at R-A11138. That is where I used to be before another Hartley tested for the BigY. The common ancestor between Hartley and Smith appears to go back 13 SNPs. These SNPs were formed about every 83 to 144 years. Either number would bring the Hartley\/Smith ancestor back to over 1,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<h3>A Hartley BigY Tester with Quaker Ancestry<\/h3>\n<p>The first BigY tester after me is important as he has the oldest genealogy. His Hartley Branch was of the Quaker faith and fled to Pennsylvania due to persecution in Lancashire County England . This Quaker ancestor was from Marsden which is quite close to Trawden in Lancashire, England. I have been able to trace my Hartley ancestors back to Trawden to around the year 1800.\u00a0 As the Quaker ancestor was born about 1666, I would guess that our common ancestor was born possibly around the year 1600. That means that, even though the location of my Hartleys is close we are about 200 years apart in connection our genealogies. The fact that this Hartley Quaker ancestor lived in Marsden suggests that my Hartley ancestors may have been in the same Parish for those 200 years.<\/p>\n<h3>A Third BigY Tester<\/h3>\n<p>Not too long ago, a third Hartley from the same branch had a BigY 700 test. I also upgraded my BigY 500 to BigY 700 so we would get consistent results. I had thought that this new tester would result in a new Hartley Branch. However, as a result of the new test, FTDNA did not determine that there was a new branch. Assuming that FTDNA was right, that would mean that we all share the same SNP (A111320) within the period of time in which a SNP would form. That time is anywhere between 83 and 144 years. A male generation is between 31 and 38 years or say about 35 years. That means that the three of us would all descend from Hartleys within\u00a0 two or four generations. In addition, we must all three descend from one particular person. This person is likely to have been a Hartley but that is not sure.<\/p>\n<h2>What I Expect From My Brother&#8217;s New BigY Test<\/h2>\n<p>It will be a while until the BigY test for my brother is expected. FTDNA predicts that the STR results will be done in June this year and the BigY completed in July. After that there is likely to be a manual review which will take longer. The result of my brother&#8217;s test will be at a minimum to put the two of us into a new YDNA Branch. This branch will likely be formed from most or all of my now private variants. I say part or all, because having a new Haplogroup with 6 new SNPs in it seems like a lot. It seems like a lot because between the three Hartley BigY testers there are an average of 4 private variants. If there is an average of 4 between 3 people there must be about twelve total private variants between the three of us. That means that I have half the private variants between three people which seems high.<\/p>\n<h3>My Six Private Variants<\/h3>\n<p>My six private variants are here:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-15_50_49-Big-Y-Results.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-14511\" src=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-15_50_49-Big-Y-Results.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"804\" height=\"306\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-15_50_49-Big-Y-Results.png 804w, http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-15_50_49-Big-Y-Results-300x114.png 300w, http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-15_50_49-Big-Y-Results-768x292.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This is the pool of SNPs from which my brother should match me. I&#8217;ll look these positions up at YBrowse:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-16_26_22-Joels-Private-Variants-BigY700.XLSX-Excel.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-14512\" src=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-16_26_22-Joels-Private-Variants-BigY700.XLSX-Excel.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"232\" height=\"142\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>That means that four of my private variants have been around waiting for a match since 2016 and none have been found. That is where my brother comes in. His test will show where he matches me. As a result of my upgrade to BigY 700, I now have two more private variants. I&#8217;m not sure why they are listed in different years, I suppose they were both found around the turn of the year.<\/p>\n<p>The new tree will look like this:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-16_47_17-Book1-Excel.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-14513\" src=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-16_47_17-Book1-Excel.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"319\" height=\"386\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-16_47_17-Book1-Excel.png 319w, http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-24-16_47_17-Book1-Excel-248x300.png 248w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 319px) 100vw, 319px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Block of SNPs will have to have a SNP name that will represent the new Block. For example A11131. I have many second cousins. That would bring the tree back two more generations. It is possible that testing one of these second cousins would also create a new branch.<\/p>\n<h2><\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>During the DNA Day YDNA sale I ordered a BigY test for my brother. Bob Wood of the FTDNA &#8211; BigY Facebook Page promotes a rule of three. That means test yourself, test a distant relative and test a close relative for BigY. That combination gives good branching for your surname &#8211; in this case &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/2020\/04\/24\/getting-ready-for-a-new-hartley-bigy-test\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Getting Ready for a New Hartley BigY Test&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,28],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14508"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14508"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14508\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14514,"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14508\/revisions\/14514"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jmhartley.com\/HBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}